![]() ![]() However, two additional reviews (Hoe, Urquhart, Kelsall, & Sim, 2012 Kennedy et al., 2010) reported limited positive results for rest breaks being effective in control- ling musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulder for computer work. Bernaards, Ariƫns, Simons, Knol, and Hildebrandt (2008) reported that reminder software was effective in encouraging the use of breaks. (2012) reported that the few studies investigating rest breaks as an intervention found positive results-decreased pain and static awkward postures. Furthermore, the effectiveness of stretching is compounded by compliance issues and appropriateness of the stretching for specific work conditions. The results indicated that the breaks, but not stretching, had an impact on the discomfort of the workers, possibly due to noncompliance of stretching. A follow-up study from this group evaluated routine breaks with stretching (Galinsky et al., 2007). ![]() ![]() A study conducted by Galinsky, Swanson, Sauter, Hurrell, and Schleifer (2000) showed that frequent (5 min break/hour) breaks significantly decreased discomfort for data entry workers as compared to a conventional break schedule (two 15 min breaks/day). Another type of postural change intervention is to remind workers to take more routine breaks. workstations has shown low levels of usage compliance-work- ers stop adjusting the tables after a few weeks, indicating any benefits could be lost over time (Wilks, Mortimer, & Nylen, 2006). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |